Southern Voice
Email:   Password:   login or create account

HOME > VIEWPOINT > EDITORIAL    
A tale of two conventions
Remembering 1968 should motivate us to be counted in 2008

By STEVE LONDON
SEP. 5, 2008
spacer
More from this author
STEVE LONDON

MORE INFO:

Steve London is publisher of Southern Voice.  He can be reached at slondon@sovo.com.

  Sound Off! about this article

  Printer-friendly

  E-Mail this story

  Letter to the Editor

Watching the non-stop media coverage of the back-to-back Democratic and Republican national conventions, I’m reminded of the first national political convention that ever caught my attention. It was 1968, some 40 years ago, a historic presidential convention held that time in Chicago.

Richard J. Daley, amid the witnesses of national broadcast and print media, brought forth the Illinois National Guard to disperse the Vietnam War protesters, creating the nation’s ugliest riots to date.

Never before had such an action been taken. Never before was our nation’s youth completely frustrated with the loss of greatness of the 1960’s — two Kennedys, one King and Malcolm X — and being thrown into a war that was senseless and without cause except to serve the purposes of the neo-conservative right to fight communism in South East Asia.

From that Democratic convention, Hubert H. Humphrey became the party’s chosen candidate. That ghastly convention was a vivid reminder of the times that those who lived through chose not to remember, and that often are not taught in today’s Modern History classes.

“Love it or leave” was the slogan of the day. Our political process is a two-party system. Imperfect as it is, it is what we are. As a ten year old, I was proud to join in my family’s Democratic support as an envelope stuffer for HHH, as he was known.

Humphrey, President Johnson’s vice president, did not have the president’s support. Johnson, a man who would not have ever been president without the aid of an assassin’s bullet and Lady Bird’s money, could not seek re-election as he was the sitting president of our nation’s most unpopular war. And because of his own ego, he would not aid the Democrat Party in retaining the White House.

HUMPHREY WAS AMERICA’S last great statesman, cut in the cloth of the Roosevelt New Deal era. What if we could have changed history and Humphrey had won the White House in 1968? What would have changed?

We would have exited the Vietnam War. The White House would have been spared the dishonor of having a presidential resignation. Trade to China would not have been opened in 1971, leaving our manufacturing sector in place.

The gold standard would have been maintained. The 1973 Oil Embargo could have been avoided. The economic decline of the 1970’s may have been prevented. Corporate ownership of all media would have been denied.

Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush the second would never have seen the White House. The decline of America’s great middle class might never have happened. The Supreme Court would still be supreme.

Did you watch the Summer Olympics? What you did not see is a nation whose air and water have been devastated by our government’s policies over these past 40 years, where much of our country’s wealth has been transferred overseas. And yet the current administration refuses to acknowledge the Kyoto Accords. How is that for an inconvenient truth? We wonder why American policy is detested worldwide.

AS THE 2008 REPUBLICAN National Convention got underway this week, who would have thought that 283 protesters would be arrested on the first day? I agree with peaceful protest, but any violence should not be tolerated.

Minnesota, the site of this year’s GOP convention, was Hubert Humphrey’s home state. But it is also the state that elected former professional wrestler Jesse Ventura as governor when its citizens became disenchanted with politics as usual. This is 2008, not 1968. What could possibly create a situation that people are compelled to violent acts?

In 1968, the largest and youngest group of Americans were drafted into a war that few believed in and in their frustration, our frustration, lashed out at the institutions that were to deny them their lives.

Today, the protests are not simply about a questionable war. They are also about the economy, health care, work and civil rights. And the party in-charge is perceived to be, and rightfully so, as the foe to those Americans.

AT THIS POINT, YOU MAY WONDER just how biased I am. I won’t deny it. But in 2008, I am not thinking just about 1968. I’m also thinking more about 2048. I’ll just be turning 90 then and I truly wonder what type of world we will be living in. The choices that we will be make today will create a tomorrow that we cannot comprehend, just as in 1968 to 2008.

2008 is historic. We are living through history. Is our country ready to make an about face? I certainly hope so. The next president will change the ...

continued on next page



1  |  2


email   password
The following comments were posted by our readers and were not edited by SOVO.  We ask that you treat others with respect; any post deemed offensive will be removed.







RELATED CONTENT
Heart of Goldy
Family and friends throw party to celebrate life of longtime gay rights activist

‘Noah’s Arc’ sails on despite Nation of Islam protest
Show’s creator disputes claims demonstration was over gay content

Too straight to play?
Gay Atlanta softball team protests World Series opponent for having too many heterosexuals

Toasting the torchbearers
Lesbian pioneers share ‘herstory’ behind Olympics, Cracker Barrel fights


MOST VIEWED ARTICLES
News:
All in a day’s work
News:
What do lesbians do in bed, anyway?
News:
The queer side of gay sex
News:
Local activists say fight for gay marriage not over
News:
Lesbians getting off — on guys going at it
News:
Homegrown porn



© Copyright 2008 Window Media LLC | User Agreement and Privacy Policy

Washington Blade | South Florida Blade | David Atlanta | The 411 Magazine | Genre Magazine